In the vast sea of artificial intelligence, I’ve set sail on over 20 different AI content-generation vessels in search of the perfect tool.
Each voyage has offered its own unique blend of features, benefits, and pitfalls.
Recently, I embarked on a journey with SurgeGraph, an AI writing software that has generated quite a buzz in the industry.
As an experienced navigator in the AI world, I was curious to see if SurgeGraph would rise above the tide or sink under the pressure of my high standards.
Unfortunately, it fell short. Here’s a deep dive into why Surge didn’t make the cut.
FOcus on negativity
I’m going to focus on shortcomings in this review. But the truth is, SurgeGraph is a pretty solid option. It’s just that it’s not the best option.
It’s a cheap option on the 36-month plan – so, this might be the right program for you.
I might change my mind as they add and change features.
Queue on Expert Commands
As a seasoned AI aficionado, I’ve seen how a snappy reaction time can make or break AI tools, and SurgeGraph was a bit of a letdown.
The queue on expert commands was unsettlingly long. It felt like being in a traffic jam, waiting for a response.
The ability to execute commands quickly can set an AI tool apart, and Surge seemed to be dragging its feet there.
Limitations in Simplifying the Whole Article
While the software demonstrated that it could simplify complex phrases, it fell short when it came to simplifying an entire article.
This was a bit of a surprise to me.
Given today’s fast-paced world, the need for succinct, intelligible information is paramount.
This is an area where SurgeGraph needs to enhance its AI capabilities.
LSI and Keyword Integration
For an AI writer, integrating NLP and a broad number of keywords is essential.
It’s like playing chess; you need to plan several steps ahead and think about every possible move.
I expected SurgeGraph to be a grandmaster in this aspect given their old LSI product, but it had a somewhat narrow gaze. The limited number of keywords included was a bit of a disappointment.
No Bulk Content Options
Creating bulk content is like a superpower for AI tools. It’s a feature that can save users countless hours.
Regrettably, SurgeGraph seemed to be missing this crucial aspect. As an tech professional who values efficiency, this was a glaring omission for me.
Lack of Media Integration
Imagine a world where words are the only means of communication, with no images or videos.
Sounds a bit boring, doesn’t it? That was my experience with SurgeGraph.
The inability to automatically add media was like trying to paint a masterpiece without colors.
This feature could have added a new dimension to the AI experience, but sadly it was missing.
Quality Concerns with GPT 3
SurgeGraph’s usage of GPT 3 felt like it was in the minor leagues when I’d expected major league performance.
The low quality of the content produced was a sore point, making me question the efficiency of the AI tool.
As someone who prizes quality, this was a red flag.
Absence of Tables and Rich Schema
The inability to generate tables and rich schema was another misfire. It’s like trying to build a house without a floor plan.
Tables and schema provide structure and organization, giving meaning to data. This is another area where the AI tool could improve.
Underperforming GPT 4 Integration
While SurgeGraph has integrated GPT 4, it still has some kinks to work out.
Compared to Koala‘s GPT 4 output, it doesn’t come near.
However, Koala’s output will cost you more than 5x as much.
Maybe cutting that corner is worth it.
Identifiable as AI
One of the goals of AI writing tools is to produce content that doesn’t sound robotic.
It’s a tightrope walk, and with Surge, it felt like the balance was off.
The output was more easily identified as AI-generated, which undermined the authenticity of the content.
Industry Competitiveness and Differentiation
It’s a wild west out there in the world of AI writing tools, and differentiation is key to survival.
Unfortunately, SurgeGraph didn’t strike me as a standout in the crowd.
The aspects I’ve touched on highlight areas where the software doesn’t quite measure up to its competitors.
Very good pricing
For all its shortcomings, the 36-month plan is amazingly cheap. It’s one of the best options out there in terms of price.
36 months is too long of a commitment when the industry is so aggressive right now, and I see nothing really setting their solution apart for now.
Final Thoughts
Given my extensive experience with AI tools, I can say that SurgeGraph has potential, but it needs work.
Its shortcomings, from slow expert command responses to limited keyword usage and missing features, undermine its effectiveness.
It doesn’t differentiate itself sufficiently in a very competitive field.
I’d advise potential users to carefully weigh these factors before choosing SurgeGraph.
SurgeGraph isn’t up to par with some other tools. They’re a bit late in their tech, but they’re on the right path. It’s worth keeping an eye on.
I’ll say this, though: their landing page is absolutely amazing and they must have killer conversion rates.